This article about a body corporate ‘buyback’ for a caretaking unit has been provided by Aleksandra Naglik, Bugden Allen Graham Lawyers.
In certain circumstances, a body corporate may be in a position where it may wish to ‘buy-back’ the management rights and caretaker’s unit within its own community titles scheme. This can occur when a caretaking agreement is terminated by the parties or if the relationship between the caretaker and the body corporate has broken down and the best solution is a ‘buy-back’.
This article will discuss the available options to facilitate the sale of a caretaking unit to a body corporate under the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (“Act”) and the Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard Module) Regulation 2008 (“Module”).
Throughout this article it should be generally noted that the Act does not envisage that a body corporate can become a long-term owner of a lot within its own community titles scheme.
GET NOTIFIED WHEN WE PUBLISH NEW Q&AS, NEWS AND ARTICLES TO THE SITE
Acquisition of amenities for the benefit of owners of lots
Section 156 of the Act states that a body corporate may acquire, and enter into agreements about the use of, real and personal property in the way, and to the extent, authorised under the Module.
Section 166 of the Module further states that a body corporate may in its name acquire freehold land for the use and enjoyment of the owners or occupiers of lots included in the community titles scheme only if authorised by a resolution without dissent.
Under these provisions it would be difficult for a body corporate to argue that the acquisition of a caretaking unit is for the actual use and enjoyment of the owners or occupiers of lots within the scheme.
Body corporate acquisition of and dealing with a lot included in its own scheme
Division 2 of Part 3 of the Act:
- allows a body corporate to acquire a lot in its own scheme if the lot is to become common property (“Common Property Unit”) for use as a residence for a letting agent, service contractor or a residence or office for a letting agent;
- requires a body corporate to lease the Common Property Unit to a letting agent or service contractor; and
- upon termination of the lease, to convert the Common Property Unit into a lot in the scheme.
This method will allow the body corporate to avoid paying stamp duty on the acquisition, however, it is only a ‘temporary fix’ as the Common Property Unit must eventually be converted into a lot and ultimately be transferred to a third party as the body corporate cannot become an owner of a lot within its own community titles scheme, otherwise than to lease it as above.
Interdependent sales contracts
As an alternative, the body corporate may be able to find a third party purchaser for the caretaker’s unit during its acquisition of the management rights agreements. The prospective purchaser could then enter into the agreement to purchase the caretaker’s unit from the caretaker and the body corporate would acquire from the caretaker what remained of the management rights. The 2 agreements would be inter-dependent.
This method will significantly reduce the amount of funds that must be expended by the body corporate to fund the acquisition; however, it will only be feasible if there is an available purchaser at the time of the acquisition.
Put-and-call option
If a third party purchaser of the caretaking unit and management rights is not readily available at the time, a ‘put-and-call option’ could be entered into between the body corporate and the caretaker.
A put-and-call option essentially allows the parties to enter into an agreement to sell or acquire something at a future point in time such as a caretaker’s unit. This type of agreement grants a future right to compel a seller to sell (‘call option’) or a purchaser to buy (‘put option’).
A put-and-call option allows a body corporate to find a purchaser of the caretaker’s unit within a specified time period. If it is unable to do so, then it will need to acquire the unit itself.
Similar to inter-dependent sales contracts, a put-and-call option will significantly reduce the amount of funds that must be expended by the body corporate. This is because the body corporate will not be required to raise funds to buy back the caretaking unit and pay the stamp duty on the purchase.
Documentation
Documenting and approving these types of transactions is very complex and a body corporate should not commit to acquiring a caretaker’s unit or even negotiate a particular approach, without first obtaining advice from a body corporate lawyer who is experienced in these types of transactions.
Have a question about a body corporate ‘buyback’ for a caretaking unit or something to add to the article? Leave a comment below.
This post appears in Strata News #317.
Aleksandra Naglik
Bugden Allen Graham Lawyers
M: 0412 046 966
E: [email protected]
This article does not constitute legal or other advice and should not be relied upon this way. Readers should take legal or other advice before applying the information containing in this publication.
Read Next:
- QLD: Removing a terrible Caretaker – Terminating Management Rights. VIDEO
- QLD: Q&As Management Rights, Extensions and the Committee’s Decision
This article has been republished with permission from the author and first appeared on the Bugden Allen Graham Lawyers website.
Visit our Building Managers OR Strata Legislation QLD
Looking for strata information concerning your state? For state-specific strata information, try here.
After a free PDF of this article? Log into your existing LookUpStrata Account to download the printable file. Not a member? Simple – join for free on our Registration page.
Kelly says
It can be done by calling the purchase an investment, I have already done this when a caretaker contract was terminated.
Ross Anderson says
Another great article from Bugden Allen Lawyers, one with a bit of meat to it including references to the legal authorities behind the author’s advice.
I appreciate these publications require more time and resources than the usual ‘tick’nflick’s, but I am confident there is a growing audience out there who want to understand the reasoning behind the opinions. Contra ‘giving them a fish’ v ‘teaching them how to fish’.
Many thanks, and I look forward to more articles with this depth of analysis.